Search for: "UNKNOWN PARTIES, Does 1-100"
Results 1 - 20
of 258
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Nov 2010, 4:01 am
Cohen agreed with Westchester County that the petition improperly names John Does "1" through "100" as Petitioners.The court said that although CPLR 1024 provides for the naming of unknown parties as defendants in an action, it does not provide for the naming of unidentified Petitioners in an Article 78 proceeding.The judge also faulted the Association for failing to come forward with any statutory authority for naming… [read post]
15 Jun 2009, 8:36 am
The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate or otherwise, of Defendants sued herein as DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, are currently unknown to PLAINTIFFS, who therefore sue said Defendants by such fictitious names. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 9:50 am
" While the position paper does raise legitimate issues that have been raised by other groups, legislatures and interested parties, such as providing information on product labels indicating if the product does contain nanomaterials, other issues, such as the demand for public debates, are more problematic. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 3:00 am
Tracfone filed a John Doe complaint against unknown defendants supposedly engaged in “an illegal scheme relating to the sale of TracFone mobile telephone airtime. [read post]
5 May 2009, 11:52 am
The true names and capacities, whether individual, associate, corporate or otherwise of Defendants Does 1 to 100 inclusive and each of them are unknown to Plaintiffs at this time who, therefore, sues said Defendants by such fictitious names. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 9:58 am
The true names and capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate, or otherwise, of Defendants DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, are unknown to Plaintiff who therefore sues said DOE Defendants by fictitious names. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 3:16 pm
Oct. 1, 2001). [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 5:01 am
Last week, Google received two requests that it remove that post from its indexes—and thus vanish it from search results—on the theory that the post violated the copyright in a Tumblr post, https://www.tumblr.com/case49news/745091056157196289/fourth-circuit-on-one-sided-pseudonymity-in-sexual: Re: Unknown NOTICE TYPE: DMCA Copyright claim 1 KIND OF WORK: Unspecified DESCRIPTION The decision allows such pseudonymity when the defendant has already been found… [read post]
3 May 2024, 8:11 am
Having one party incognito but no [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 4:51 pm
An unsecured router may provide access to many unknown persons. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm
Stroud is General Counsel at Unified Patents – an organization often adverse to litigation-funded entities.[1] He is also an adjunct professor at American University Washington College of Law. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 11:14 am
A mediated settlement agreement is binding under section 6.602 of the Family Code if the agreement: (1) provides, in a prominently displayed statement that is in boldfaced type or capital letters or underlined, that the agreement is not subject to revocation; (2) is signed by each party to the agreement; and (3) is signed by the party’s attorney, if any, who is present at the time the agreement is signed. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 9:42 am
This is how it works: a user uploads her library on Booxup, or, at least, the books she does not mind to lend, by scanning their bar codes. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
This is also a particular consequence of the general procedural principle of party d [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm
-------------COHAN: …And I think this incident frankly, the paying of the $100 million, has unfortunately corrupted the university a little bit.Comment: Again, there’s no evidence that Duke paid $100 million to anyone. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 12:14 pm
MIKE SMITH, JOHN DOES 1-100, JANE DOES 1-100, XYZ COMPANY, Defendants. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Quander, 370 F.Supp.2d 79, 99-100 (D.D.C. 2005). [read post]
21 Mar 2024, 5:52 am
Virginia, 448 U.S. 555, 596-97, 100 S.Ct. 2814, 65 L.Ed.2d 973 (1980) (Brennan, J., concurring) ("Public trials come to the attention of key witnesses unknown to the parties. [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 3:04 am
Plaintiff does not claim he received this letter after June 13,2008. [read post]
19 Oct 2021, 11:54 pm
As requested, the parties were summoned to oral proceedings. [read post]
